Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-576PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*679 MEMORANDUM OPINION

SCHMEHL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Bonnie Gardner (“Gardner”), brings the instant action to challenge the denial of her claim for disability benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), the insurance company that funded and administered the disability insurance plan provided by her employer. Gardner claims that MetLife’s denial of her claim for long term disability benefits was arbitrary and capricious.

The parties have each moved for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Miller v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. YAHAWI v. BOILERMAKER-BLACKSMITH NATIONAL PENSION TRUSTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API