Legal Opinion

Clavan v. Herman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1925No. Appeal, 346PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff sued to recover the purchase price of three hundred dozen pairs of men’s hose, being the balance of an order for one thousand dozen, seven hundred of which had been delivered, accepted and paid for by defendants. The jury found for plaintiff for the full amount claimed, the court however subsequently entered judgment for defendants non obstante veredicto on the ground that plaintiff failed to perform his part by making or tendering delivery of the goods and that his remedy, if any, was not to recover the purchase price, but for damages for breach of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zuck v. McClure & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  2. Frank Pure Food Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Huessener v. Fishel & Marks Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Fairfax Textile Mills, Inc. v. FeingoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. 2401 Pennsylvania Avenue Corp. v. Federation of Jewish AgenciesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Weinglass v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. McCormick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Glover v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Everedy MacHine Co. v. Hazle Maid BakersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API