Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Lincoln & Roe

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment entered at the circuit upon the verdict of a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Welles, J.

The action was upon a promissory note given by the defendants to the plaintiff, on which Lincoln was the accommodation surety for Roe. The defense-set up by Lincoln was, that after the note became due, he requested Merritt, the payee and holder, to collect the note of Roe, the principal, and directed him to sue Roe, which Merritt, the plaintiff, neglected to do. That thereafter, and before the commencement of this action, Roe became insolvent and unable to pay his debts, and made an assignment for the benefit of his creditors, whereby Lincoln, the surety, became…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fulton v. MatthewsNew York Supreme Court · 1818

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cady v. SheldonNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Goldsmith v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API