Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. Newark Fire Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 1935No. Appeal, 231PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The material issues involved in this case are all satisfactorily disposed of in the clear and convincing opinion of President Judge Brownson of the court below. It is not necessary to add to it beyond citing, as additional authority, the cases of Banco Commerciale de Puerto Rico v. Royal Exchange Assurance Corp., 71 Fed. (2d) 933, C. C. A. 1st Circuit, and Overholt v. Reliance Ins. Co., 319 Pa. 340, 179 A. 554; and calling attention to the fact that the standard form of fire insurance policy is prescribed by statute (Act of May 17, 1921, P. L. 682, pp. 732, 733, secs. 522, 523, 40…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Overholt Et Ux. v. Reliance Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
3Cited by18 opinions
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Pauline Rosenbaum v. John Funcannon, as Administrator of the Estate of Martha A. Call, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- McAllister v. Millville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Miners Savings Bank v. Merchants Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Hier v. Farmers Mutual Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.