Legal Opinion

Flying Phoenix Corporation v. Creative Packaging Machinery

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 12, 2012No. 11-8077PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Flying Phoenix Corporation (“Flying Phoenix”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its claims against North Park Transportation Company and R & L Carriers Shared Services (“the carriers”), with prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Background

Flying Phoenix Corporation, a Wyoming corporation in the business of importing and reselling fireworks, purchased a machine designed to package fireworks for sale to end users from Creative Packaging Machinery, Inc., a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Mitsui & Co (USA) v. Euro-Baltic LinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. Sigala v. BravoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Wyoming v. United States Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2016
  2. Ingram Barge Company, LLC v. Bunge North America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
  3. Ingram Barge Company, LLC v. Louis Dreyfus Company, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
  4. Saray Dokum ve Madeni Aksam Sanayi Turizm A.S. v. MTS Logistics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API