Legal Opinion

Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. C. F. Knoll Planting & Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 26, 1913No. 19,875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides; W. R. Blackman, Judge. Action by the Hibernia Bank & Trust Company, Trustee, against the C. F. Knoll Planting & Manufacturing Company, Limited. The Dibert, Bancroft & Ross Company, Limited, intervened claiming a vendor’s privilege. From judgment for the intervener, plaintiff: appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

At a foreclosure sale, the Dibert, Bancroft & Ross Company, Limited, claimed a vendor’s privilege for balance due on a cane crusher, two mill roller shells, and an engine, having sold them to the Knoll Planting & Manufacturing Company for the price of $9,200, upon which there was a balance due of $6,900, secured, as it alleged in its intervention, by a vendor’s privilege. The firm alleged in its petition of intervention that this machinery was easily identifiable, and that it was easily separable from the other machinery of the C. F. Knoll Planting & Manufacturing Company.

Prior to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swoop v. St. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Walburn-Swenson Co. v. DarrellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  3. Hoy v. PetermanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
  4. Lambert v. SaloySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monroe Automobile & Supply Co. v. ColeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Caldwell v. Laurel Grove Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. Legendre v. McCall's EstateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API