Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Phillips & Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlore, J.

The plaintiffs instituted an action (No. 1111 of ,1920) for the recovery of $810 damages for alleged breach by defendant of a contract for the sale of a quantity of potatoes. -The defendant is a foreign corporation and has no office in New York, plaintiffs obtained a warrant of attachment, and the warrant as ;Wglk\¡as the summons and complaint was served on an employee *22in New York city of the New York Central Railroad Company, in whose charge there was a carload of potatoes belonging to the defendant. The marshal sold this carload of potatoes as perishable property and realized $1,875, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. SchroederAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  2. Mitchell v. SchroederAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Nurenberg v. KeithAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Purchasing Co. v. WoodworthNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Foresto v. ForkerNassau County District Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API