Owens v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtMcDERMOTT, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The purpose of this action is to determine the power of the state legislature to do two things: (1) To forbid a citizen to erect a eotton gin and gin eotton for others, without consent of the Corporation Commission; and (2) To prescribe the charge such owner shall make to his neighbor for the service rendered.
The questions presented are fundamental and have been ably and extensively briefed. The defendants press upon us Brass v. Stoeser, 153 U. S. 391, 14 S. Ct. 857, 38 L. Ed. 757, where a North Dakota statute regulating the charge for service rendered by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Helbig v. Zoning Commission of Noank Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Greenhills Home Owners Corp. v. Village of GreenhillsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. FishmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
- Commissioner v. Independent Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932