Legal Opinion

Empire Guano Co. v. Ellis

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1923No. 6 Div. 241PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The appellant brought its action against appellee in the court below, to recover the sum of $125.25, with accrued interest, and the additional sum of $20 as a reasonable attorney’s fee, all alleged to be due under a certain promissory note, which is set out in the bill of exceptions.. The defendant interposed several pleas: (1) The general issue; (2) non est factum; (3, 4, and 5) -interposed the defense of an alteration in the note sued on after its execution, without the .knowledge or consent of the maker; (6) failure of consideration.

The complaint alleged that the note in question was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Perkins v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Union Mut. Aid Ass'n v. CarrowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. McCay v. ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Hess v. HodgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Helton v. EasterAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Krasner v. ReedAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Summers v. DobbinsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. BanksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API