Legal Opinion

Broatch v. Boysen

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1916No. 4409PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming; John A. Riner, Judge. Action by William J. Broatch and others against Asmus Boysen and another. From the accounting and'final decree, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

S \NBORN, Circuit Judge.

The appellants challenge the accounting and final decree made by the court below pursuant to the decision of this court and its mandate in Broatch v. Boysen et al., 175 Fed. 702, 710, 99 C. C. A. 278. In April, 1899, Boysen agreed with the appellants and others that they would, at their joint expense, prospect for, and, if possible, obtain from the United States, a lease of a large tract of land in the Shoshone and Wind River Indian reservation in Wyo-ing available for coal and other minerals. Boysen in 1899 proceeded to acquire such a lease of 178,000 acres of land…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broatch v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Hot Springs Coal Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  5. Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API