Legal Opinion
Arreola v. Choudry
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 14, 2008No. 07-2696PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Gilbert Arreola brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that prison doctor Mohammed Choudr/s treatment of his injured ankle constituted a deliberate indifference to a medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Following a two-day trial, a jury found in favor of Dr. Choudry. Arreola moved for a new trial, arguing that conversations between his lawyer and various jury members after the verdict revealed that the foreperson was biased. The district court denied the motion. Arreola challenges the refusal to grant a new trial, arguing that his due process…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arreola v. GodinezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BenabeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Mejia v. Cook County, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Davin Hackett v. City of South BendCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Alfonso Torres-ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.