Legal Opinion

Sholgen v. Lipsett, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Schwartz, J.

A member of a union which has signed a collective agreement with an employer brings this proceeding to compel arbitration under that agreement. Petitioner, as an employee, is not a party to that agreement. Under the *297arbitration terms thereof, only the union has the right to demand arbitration and not any individual members of the union who may have a grievance. To permit individual employees to invoke the arbitration machinery of a collective agreement would disrupt the proper operation of such procedures. The motion is therefore denied. Since the union has submitted an affidavit to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cox v. R. H. Macy & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Matter of Village of Walden v. Teamsters Local Union No. 445Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Soto v. Lenscraft Optical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API