Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas A. Rodrigue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1976No. 76-1868PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Rodrigue appeals from an order of the district court 1 denying appellant relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 2 Rodrigue’s action is based on the premise that at the time of his plea and sentence he had not been properly advised of the existence of a special parole term mandatorily imposed under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) for drug offenses. Rodrigue also alleges that his total sentence exceeded his “plea bargain.” '

It appears that no mention was made of the mandatory special parole term by the court to Rodrigue. Concededly, a Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 error was made as a result of this omission as pointed out…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Garth McRae v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cotton v. HuttoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. James Edward OsmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Robin Jack SamuelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Michael Kattou and Joseph MaggioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API