United States v. Thomas A. Rodrigue
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Rodrigue appeals from an order of the district court 1 denying appellant relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 2 Rodrigue’s action is based on the premise that at the time of his plea and sentence he had not been properly advised of the existence of a special parole term mandatorily imposed under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) for drug offenses. Rodrigue also alleges that his total sentence exceeded his “plea bargain.” '
It appears that no mention was made of the mandatory special parole term by the court to Rodrigue. Concededly, a Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 error was made as a result of this omission as pointed out…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Frank RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Garth McRae v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cotton v. HuttoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. James Edward OsmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Robin Jack SamuelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Michael Kattou and Joseph MaggioCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.