Yoes v. Continental Oil Co.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
BAGON, District Judge.
The complaint of the plaintiffs joins the Continental Oil Company, IT. H. Meads, and Fred Couch as defendants in this action. They allege that Meads was the agent and at all times employed by the defendant oil company in the management and distribution of its products from its office at Fayetteville, Ark., and, as such, directed and supervised the sale and delivery of the oil products under the instructions of the defendant oil company; they allege that the defendant Fred Couch was at all times in the employ of the defendant oil company, under the direct supervision of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchwyhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Southern Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Gulf Refining Co. v. Huffman WeakleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donaldson v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1935