Legal Opinion
Southern Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 9, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.
Counsel for appellees seek to uphold the decision of the chancery court as to the lands colored red on the map under our statute making payment of taxes under color of title for seven years constructive adverse possession of wild and unimproved lands. The Legislature of 1899 passed the following act:
“Unimproved and uninclosed land shall be deemed and held to be in possession of the person who pays the taxes thereon if he have color of title thereto, but no person shall be entitled to invoke the benefit of this act unless he and those under whom he claims shall have paid such taxes for at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- The West Point Iron. Co. v. . ReymertNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Updegraff v. Marked Tree Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Graysonia-Nashville Lumber Co. v. Saline Development Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Ames v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Hubble v. GrimesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Burbridge v. Bradley Lumber Co. of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Lewis v. Delinquent LandsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Christensen v. MunsterUtah Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.