Legal Opinion

American National Bank of Dallas v. Dallas Tinware Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Burke.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

On September 14, 1894, appellant sued the Dallas Tinware Manufacturing Company, a private corporation, on two promissory notes, for the aggregate sum of $2566.84, and simultaneously applied for and obtained an attachment, which was levied upon the property of said company. J. B. Adoue intervened in the suit, alleging that the company had made a general assignment of all its assets.

The Dallas Tinware Manufacturing Company answered that at the time the attachment was levied said company was hopelessly insolvent, and was in the act of making a general assignment for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orr & Lindsley Shoe Co. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rogers v. East Line Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Moon Bros. Carriage Co. v. Waxahachie Grain & Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zorn v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. Peck & FlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. General Electric Co. v. Canton City Ice & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Compton v. Three Rivers Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API