Gaudet v. Stansfield
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Tort, at common law, for personal injuries while in the employ of the defendants. Writ dated October 7, 1899. In the Superior Court Pierce, J. ordered a verdict for the defendants; and the plaintiff alleged exceptions.
1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.
At the time of the accident, the defendants were the proprietors of a steam laundry. The plaintiff was over nineteen years of age, had been in the employ of the defendants about ten weeks, and had worked on a mangle about three weeks. This machine was about four feet high, and consisted of a steam chest which rested on the floor, and was about seven or eight feet long and about two feet high. Upon the steam chest was a roll of the same length and about two and a quarter feet in diameter. This roll was covered with felt, canvas and linen, and revolved three or four times a minute. By moving a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ciriack v. Merchants' Woolen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Ciriack v. Merchants' Woolen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Connolly v. EldredgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Lowcock v. Franklin Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Wilson v. Massachusetts Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burke v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Boyd v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Quinn v. Electric Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Manning v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Amero v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.