Legal Opinion

Gaudet v. Stansfield

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Tort, at common law, for personal injuries while in the employ of the defendants. Writ dated October 7, 1899. In the Superior Court Pierce, J. ordered a verdict for the defendants; and the plaintiff alleged exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.

At the time of the accident, the defendants were the proprietors of a steam laundry. The plaintiff was over nineteen years of age, had been in the employ of the defendants about ten weeks, and had worked on a mangle about three weeks. This machine was about four feet high, and consisted of a steam chest which rested on the floor, and was about seven or eight feet long and about two feet high. Upon the steam chest was a roll of the same length and about two and a quarter feet in diameter. This roll was covered with felt, canvas and linen, and revolved three or four times a minute. By moving a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ciriack v. Merchants' Woolen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Ciriack v. Merchants' Woolen Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Connolly v. EldredgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Lowcock v. Franklin Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Wilson v. Massachusetts Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burke v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. Boyd v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Quinn v. Electric Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Manning v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Amero v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API