Legal Opinion

Harris v. Cook

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1897No. Sac. No. 264PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced. County and from an order denying a new trial. J. K. Law, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment directing that a peremptory writ of mandate issue to the auditor of Merced county, requiring him to draw a warrant for the sum of ninety-one dollars and fifty cents. At the request of the tax collector of the county of Merced, plaintiffs printed the delinquent tax list for the fiscal year 1894-95. They presented a claim for the work done to the board of supervisors of the county, and it was allowed and approved. This approved claim forms the basis of the application for the 'writ.

Among the findings of fact made by the trial court there is the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smeltzer v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smeltzer v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API