Legal Opinion
Jack Goodman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1966No. 20811_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
369 F.2d 166
Jack GOODMAN, Paramount Ice Cream Corp. and Frigid Process Co., Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Manuel L. Real, United States Attorney, Robert H. Lund, Chief Intelligence Division, Internal Revenue Service, Frederick C. Nielsen, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, David Stutz, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service, and Keith M. Loebig, Internal Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue Service, Appellees.
No. 20811.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
November 18, 1966.
Rehearing Denied December 29, 1966.
Walter Weiss, of Goodson & Hannam, Los Angeles, Cal., for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Clifford O. Boren, Delta M. Boren and Clifford O. Boren Contracting Co., Inc. v. Lloyd M. Tucker, Special Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.