Legal Opinion

Boeppler v. Menown

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St; Louis Circuit Court, Lubke, J.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

An insolvent manufacturing corporation made an assignment to the plaintiff, under the statute, for the benefit of its creditors. As such assignee, the plaintiff has brought the present action against the defendant, a stockholder in the corporation, to recover the balance remaining unpaid upon his shares of stock, alleging in general terms “ that the whole amount of said unpaid bal- . anee on said stock * * * is needed to pay the debts of said corporation.”

The answer is : 1. A general denial. 2. An allegation that no call for the unpaid balance sued for has been ■ made either by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eppright v. NickersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Jerman's Adm'r v. BentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Shockley v. FisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  4. Lionberger v. Broadway Savings BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SatchwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. State v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Hauser v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API