Legal Opinion

Smith v. Perfection Hy-Test

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 1991No. 76334PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ADAMS, Presiding Judge:

The trial court found Claimant Ben Smith did not sustain an accidental injury or occupational disease to his lungs or respiratory system arising out of and in the course of his employment with Employer Perfection Hy-Test as alleged in Smith’s claim for compensation. Claimant appealed that decision to a three-judge panel, and the trial court was affirmed. Claimant asks this court to set aside the trial court decision, arguing it is not supported by any competent evidence.

Claimant argues the record contains no evidence controverting his testimony and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Bittman v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Armco, Inc. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Treat v. McDonald'sCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Frew v. McDonnell Douglas, Industrial Indemnity Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Rivera v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API