Legal Opinion
Dipasquale v. Board of Review
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 5, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Opinion of the court was delivered by
KEEFE, J.A.D.
Petitioner Joseph R. DiPasquale appeals from a final determination of the Board of Review (Board) denying him the alternate benefit year calculation afforded by N.J.S.A 43:21 — 19(c)(3). On appeal, petitioner contends that the Board improperly interpreted the statute in the context of the uncontroverted facts presented. We agree with petitioner and reverse the judgment under review for the reason stated herein.
Petitioner was employed as an automobile mechanic by Burns Honda on May 10, 1992 when he was injured in the course of his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Schierstead v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Roig v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- AMN, Inc. v. Township of South Brunswick Rent Leveling BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Central Hanover B. & T. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilliland v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Bodnarchuk v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Anderson v. State, Emp't Sec. Div.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
- Gary Grayson as Attorney-In-Fact for Lela Grayson v. Richard Grayson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011