Legal Opinion

Clarence Derose v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1963No. 17996_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.

Convicted of selling a narcotic drug unlawfully imported into the United States (21 U.S.C. § 174) and of forcibly resisting federal officers who were engaged in performance of their duties (18 U.S.C. §§ 111 and 1114), DeRose appeals. He attacks only the narcotics conviction, for which he was sentenced to five years. (Sentence on the other count was one year, concurrent).

At the trial, DeRose testified that on February 9, 1962 he took a “special employee” of the government, one Douglas, to a place in San Francisco where the drug was “stashed,” showed him the narcotic…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. IngCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Richard Donald Costello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Laurence Fredrick Anthony v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. United States v. George Roger MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API