Legal Opinion
United States v. Mancuso
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1994No. Nos. 92-5819, 92-5831, 92-5832, 92-5841, 92-5842, 93-5011 to 93-5014 and 93-5123PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
Louis Mancuso, Susan Mancuso, Philip Hartman, Hartman Rack Products, Inc. and Robert Schmidt bring a direct appeal for review of their criminal convictions and sentences for bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and making false statements to a federally-insured financial institution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014. For the reasons set out below, we affirm each of the convictions. Finding error in the district court’s interpretation of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, however,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Robert Peter RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Marlene Cox Schneider and Paul S. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robert E. Bales, A/K/A Bob Bailes, A/K/A Robert E. BailesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. LightyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. JohnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Daniel I. Colton, United States of America v. Daniel I. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jimmy Lee Williams, United States of America v. Jimmy Lee WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.