Legal Opinion
Graves v. Adult & Family Services Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 6, 1985No. 5-1701-FX0476-5; CA A29398PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*217BUTTLER, P. J.
Petitioner1 seeks review of a final order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) terminating his general assistance benefits. Because his entitlement to those benefits was based on a determination that he was mentally ill, he contends that the agency’s failure to ensure his representation at the pretermination hearing denied him a meaningful opportunity to be heard, in violation of Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution and the Due Process Clause of the federal Fourteenth Amendment. He also contends that ORS 183.418 denies him equal protection of the law by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murphy v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Graves v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985