Legal Opinion

Swarthout v. Cooke

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 24, 2011No. 10-333PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

I

California’s parole statute provides that the Board of Prison Terms “shall set a release date unless it determines *217that . . . consideration of the public safety requires a more lengthy period of incarceration.” Cal. Penal Code Ann. § 3041(b) (West Supp. 2010). If the board denies parole, the prisoner can seek judicial review in a state habeas petition. The California Supreme Court has explained that “the standard of review properly is characterized as whether 'some evidence’ supports the conclusion that the inmate is unsuitable for parole because he or she currently is dangerous.” In re…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Swarthout v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Andrew Jones v. T McGuinnessDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API