Legal Opinion

Honohan v. Holt

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided November 26, 1968No. 224857PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.

On July 30,1965, the Ohio General Assembly amended Section 3327.01, Revised Code, and enacted Section 3327.011, Revised Code, to become effective January 1, 1966. The title of the bill was “to provide all school children with safe transportation to and from school.” Prior to that time the Ohio law had provided for transportation at public expense only to and from publicly-opened and operated schools. The 1965 amendment extended the transportation provisions to cover all children attending a “school for which the state board of education prescribes minimum standards,” thus including…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Everson v. Board of Ed. of EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Snyder v. Town of NewtownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. School Committee of EssexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Board of Education v. BakalisIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Hughes v. Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Bloom v. School Committee of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Preterm-Cleveland v. Stephanie McCloudCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API