United States Ex Rel. Innes v. Crystal
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, a soldier in the military service of the United States, was convicted of criminal charges by a court-martial of the United States Army, and sought habeas corpus because of alleged errors committed by the court-martial.
The authorities generally are to the effect that the civil courts cannot consider errors at a court-martial except those that affect the jurisdiction of the court-martial or the fixing of a penalty beyond its statutory powers. 1 2None of the alleged errors here goes to that extent. Thus one of the alleged errors was that counsel assigned to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Swaim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Mullan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Ex parte DickeyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Innes v. HiattCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Burns v. Lovett, Secretary of Defense Dennis v. Lovett, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Innes v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
- Ex Parte BentonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1945
- Henry v. HodgesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.