Legal Opinion

Roe v. CITY INVESTING/GENERAL DEV. CORP.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 7, 1991No. 76702PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

587 So.2d 1323 (1991)

William D. ROE, Petitioner,

v.

CITY INVESTING/GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et al., Respondents.

No. 76702.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 7, 1991.

Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood, and Thomas Cassidy of Smith, Cassidy, Platt & Harris, P.A., Lakeland, for petitioner.

Gerald W. Pierce of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A., Fort Myers, for respondents.

BARKETT, Justice.

We review City Investing/General Development Corp. v. Roe, 566 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), in which the district court certified the following as a question of great public…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Grimes; Concurrence · Overton.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Daniel v. Holmes Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Proctor v. Swing Set Day Care CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. CITY INVESTING/GENERAL DEV. CORP. v. RoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holder v. Keller Kitchen CabinetsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Bell v. Commercial CarriersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Universal Rivet, Inc. v. CashDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Colonial Oaks Apartment v. HoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Mullins v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API