United States v. Sitzmann
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States' District Judge
This matter is before the Court on defendant Gregory Joel Sitzmann’s motion for an order directing the production of the grand jury testimony of George Jones and Terrence Colligan, as well as all other impeachment evidence that may be in the government’s possession. The government opposes the defendant’s motion. ’Upon consideration of the parties’ written submissions, the relevant case law, and pertinent portions of the record in this case, the Court will deny the defendant’s motion. 1
I. BACKGROUND
After a 23-day trial in .April…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Gregory SitzmannCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Gregory SitzmannCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. SaffariniaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. SimmonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.