Stanbrough v. M'Call
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from the District Court of Madison, Selby, I.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of tho court* was pronounced by
Súdele, J.
The plaintiff has been endeavoring, for seven- years, to enforce his rights as a mortgage creditor upon a tract of land. In this protracted litigation he was at first opposed by Collier, represented by Stockton, as his counsel; and subsequently, by Stockton, in his own right.
This suit was commenced in 1842, by an order of seizure and sale, upon a note which fell, due in January, 1842, and which, with two others, was given by M’Call to his vendor, David Stanbrough, curator of the succession of Jesse I-Iarper. To secure these notos M’ Call…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Gordon v. GilfoilSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Board of Com'rs v. Toyo Kisen KaishaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Lacour Plantation Co. v. JewellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co. v. PetermanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Manders v. IrwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.