Legal Opinion

Stanbrough v. M'Call

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1849PublishedCited by 7 opinions

from the District Court of Madison, Selby, I.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of tho court* was pronounced by

Súdele, J.

The plaintiff has been endeavoring, for seven- years, to enforce his rights as a mortgage creditor upon a tract of land. In this protracted litigation he was at first opposed by Collier, represented by Stockton, as his counsel; and subsequently, by Stockton, in his own right.

This suit was commenced in 1842, by an order of seizure and sale, upon a note which fell, due in January, 1842, and which, with two others, was given by M’Call to his vendor, David Stanbrough, curator of the succession of Jesse I-Iarper. To secure these notos M’ Call…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gordon v. GilfoilSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Board of Com'rs v. Toyo Kisen KaishaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Lacour Plantation Co. v. JewellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  4. Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co. v. PetermanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Manders v. IrwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API