Legal Opinion

Santos Cervantes, Esther Cervantes, David Cervantes and Martha Cervantes v. Rosie Cervantes

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided November 5, 2009No. 03-07-00381-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00381-CV Santos Cervantes, Esther Cervantes, David Cervantes and Martha Cervantes, Appellants v. Rosie Cervantes, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 26,484, HONORABLE H. R. TOWSLEE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellee, Rosie Cervantes, obtained a default judgment ordering appellants Santos, Esther, David, and Martha Cervantes to specifically perform their promise to convey property and to pay attorney’s fees and costs in her suit for fraud, fraud in the inducement, breach of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API