Legal Opinion

Agnew v. Shaw

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 28, 2005No. 1-02-3233PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neville

Plaintiff, Rita Agnew, filed a lawsuit against the three defendants— Charles Shaw, M.D., an internist; Henry Wiggins, M.D., a radiologist; and Universal Radiology, Ltd., Dr. Wiggins’ corporation — alleging a failure to timely diagnose her occult breast cancer. After a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff now appeals from the jury verdict in favor of the defendants and presents two issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court erred by striking the extrapolation testimony of the plaintiffs expert witness pursuant to Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. People v. IllgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Donaldson v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kimble v. Earle M. Jorgenson Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Gomez v. the Finishing Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Donnellan v. First Student, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Bosco v. JanowitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Klehm-Marinangel v. KlehmAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API