Legal Opinion

United Missouri Bank, N.A. v. City of Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 2003No. WD 62543PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.

Kansas City’s municipal government lost its battle with United Missouri Bank over earnings taxes when the circuit court granted summary judgment for UMB. The city appeals, charging the circuit court with erroneously rejecting its definition of “necessary expenses of operation,” which are exempt from the city’s earnings tax. We conclude that the circuit court erred in issuing summary judgment because UMB’s right to it depends on the presence or absence of certain material facts, and UMB has not established an absence of dispute about those facts. We reverse the judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. State Ex Inf. Hannah Ex Rel. Christ v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. St. Louis Children's Hospital v. ConwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. Hopkins v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. UMB BANK, NA. v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API