Legal Opinion

Fain Grocery Co. v. Early & Daniels Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Long, J., at tbe February Term, 1921, of CHEROKEE. Plaintiff claimed that J. S. Bateman & Company, of Cincinnati, Ohio, owed it. Plaintiff was holding Bateman & Company’s hay, at Murphy, N. 0. Bateman called iffaintiff over the telephone, and plaintiff agreed to release the hay if Bateman would get Early & Daniels Company to guarantee the claim.

Read the full summary

Appeal by plaintiff from Long, J., at tbe February Term, 1921, of CHEROKEE. Plaintiff claimed that J. S. Bateman & Company, of Cincinnati, Ohio, owed it. Plaintiff was holding Bateman & Company’s hay, at Murphy, N. 0. Bateman called iffaintiff over the telephone, and plaintiff agreed to release the hay if Bateman would get Early & Daniels Company to guarantee the claim. Bateman then went to Early & Daniels Company, told them Fain did not want to pay Bateman’s drafts because of some shortage claims which existed, and asked them to wire Fain of his standing. Early and Daniels Company then sent…

1Opinion of the CourtWalKEE, J.

We concur with bis Honor, Judge Long, tbat there was no guaranty, which is a contract, or promise, to answer for tbe debt, default, or miscarriage of another, who is himself liable, in tbe first instance, for tbe same. Carpenter v. Wall, 20 N. C. (144), 279. It is in tbe nature of an undertaking tbat tbe thing promised by the principal shall be done and not merely an engagement jointly with tbe principal to do tbe thing. Coleman v. Fuller, 105 N. C., 328. Tbe plaintiff might well have known from tbe face of tbe telegram tbat there was no promise by Early & Daniels Company to pay tbe debt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Clark's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Clarke v. RusselSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
  3. Coleman v. . FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Eaton v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Hardy v. . PoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank v. LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Trust Co. v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Page Trust Co. v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP v. MuntjanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API