Legal Opinion

State v. Darrah

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1939No. 6669Published

1Opinion

A petition for rehearing having been granted this cause was again submitted to the court. We have considered the entire record with great care and conclude that the former opinion should not be disturbed other than to add the following general statement. Had the state rested after having established thecorpus delicti, that is that a burglary had been committed, and further that appellant was in the conscious possession of the recently stolen property, with knowledge that the same had been stolen, such possession being unexplained there would have been sufficient circumstances to be considered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. VanekIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. SanfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State v. BogrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. JackettIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API