Legal Opinion

Noel v. Noel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1934No. 8 Div. 547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

This is the second appeal from rulings on demurrer. Noel v. Noel, 225 Ala. 302, 143 So. 469.

The bill was amended, demurrer overruled, and appeal taken.

The difference between pleading fraud proper and that of undue influence — a species of constructive fraud — has been indicated in Alexander v. Gibson, 176 Ala. 258, 57 So. 760; 8 R. C. L. page 1032; and in the latter instance, held general averments will not suffice, depending, as it does, upon the circumstances of each particular case (Shipman v. Furniss, 69 Ala. 555, 44 Am. Rep. 528); hut the constituent facts must he averred…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shipman v. FurnissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Cooper v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Ray's Adm'r v. WombleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Cox v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Abrams v. AbramsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. MenefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Fortune v. BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Leeth v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Patterson v. LeonardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API