Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided August 16, 1985No. TC 1981 and 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Judge.

These cases involve the valuation of an industrial plant under the provisions of ORS 308.411. At the time set for trial, defendant objected to plaintiffs’ use of the replacement cost used approach on the grounds that it takes into consideration functional and economic obsolescence. Inasmuch as plaintiffs are electing owners under ORS 308.411, defendant contends that plaintiffs are precluded from using this method. At the request of the parties, the court agreed to issue an interlocutory ruling on defendant’s objection.

The court is indebted to counsel for its understanding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TippieOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Department of Revenue v. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SIMPLOT CO. v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API