Legal Opinion

Lucas v. Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 15, 1978No. 78-29PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their petition for the recovery of post-judgment interest from defendant. On appeal, they contend that this order is erroneous and should be reversed.

The following facts are pertinent to the disposition of this appeal.

Plaintiffs were injured, in separate accidents, while riding in automobiles which collided with taxicabs insured by LaSalle National Insurance Company (LaSalle). LaSalle’s liability under its insurance policy with the cab company was *20,000 at the time of Lucas’ accident and *25,000 at the time of Mastandrea’s. Lucas and Mastandrea both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pinkstaff v. Pennsylvania RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lucas v. Illinois Insurance Guaranty FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Proctor Community Hospital v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Richeson v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  5. People Ex Rel. Holland v. HalprinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Chicago v. Park National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Pierre v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Robinson v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Liquidation of Pine Top Insurance v. ShapoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. In re Liquidation of Pine Top Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API