Legal Opinion

Steinhouse v. Neal

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

We granted Defendants-Appellants’ Rule 11 Application for Permission to Appeal in order to determine whether the time limit to appeal an action from General Sessions Court, by an unsuccessful party in an unlawful detainer action, is 2 days or 10 days.

Plaintiff-Appellee, John Steinhouse, brought this action in the General Sessions Court of Davidson County and alleged that the Defendants “were unlawfully detaining certain lands to which Plaintiff was entitled *626to possession.” Judgment was entered in the General Sessions Court on June 12, 1985, restoring Plaintiff to the possession of the…

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pacific Eastern Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Hayes v. Gibson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Profill Development, Inc. v. DillsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Brewer v. Lincoln Brass Works, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API