Legal Opinion

Golian v. Polhironakis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 19, 1980No. 80-700PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMES, Judge.

The only point in this appeal which gave us any concern was whether a landowner in a subdivision can enforce deed restrictions against another landowner in the same sub*188division when the restrictions contain a provision allowing the original grantor “to amend, alter or change” them. However, we believe that this court’s recent opinion in Loch Haven Homeowners’ Association v. Nelle, 389 So.2d 697, (Fla. 2d DCA, 1980), controls our decision.

In Loch Haven, the lower court had held that because the developer of a subdivision had reserved the right to amend the restrictions, this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flamingo Ranch Est., Inc. v. Sunshine Ranches H., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Bay Island Towers, Inc. v. Bay Island-Siesta Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. LOCH HAVEN HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N, INC. v. NelleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Markey v. WolfCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Wright v. Cypress Shores Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. KL & JL Investments, Inc. v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
  4. McCown v. GottliebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API