Legal Opinion

Millikan v. Temple

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1883No. 10,585PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

By the record of this cause and the appellants’ assignment of error endorsed thereon, the only question presented for the decision of this court is the sufficiency of the facts stated in appellee’s complaint to constitute a cause of action against the appellant Frank Millikan.

The appellee’s complaint contained two paragraphs, and the demurrer of the appellant Millikan was to the complaint as an entirety, and not to each paragraph separately. The demurrer was overruled by the court to the entire complaint, and the only error assigned by the appellants, in this court, is thus assigned: “ That…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Romine v. RomineIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Jewett v. Honey Creek Draining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Urton v. LuckeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Anderson v. O'ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Harter v. ParsonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API