Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 14, 1981No. 62185Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRendlen, Judge

I join the majority in its affirmance of appellant’s convictions for assault with in*83tent to rape with malice aforethought and carrying a concealed weapon. However, I dissent to that portion of the majority opinion reversing appellant’s conviction for armed criminal action for the same reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in State v. Haggard, 419 S.W.2d 44, decided this date.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stigers v. HarlowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967