United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Kelly-Mohrhusen Co., Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation v. Merle A. Patnode Co., Limited
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Circuit Judge.
This is an action to recover $2,950 for labor and materials furnished by plaintiff in connection with the construction of an addition to the United States Post Office in Delavan, Wisconsin. Pursuant to an arrangement with the roofing subcontractor, who went bankrupt, plaintiff supplied and installed the flashing. The question presented is whether his notice to the general contractor was adequate to preserve his claim against the surety on its payment bond, the general contractor having also become insolvent. The answer turns on whether the relevant statute, 40 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States ex rel. Hallenbeck v. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- United States Ex Rel. John A. Denie's Sons Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cti/dc, Incorporated v. Selective Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Okee Industries, Inc. v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Ray Moody v. The American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States Ex Rel. Excavation Construction, Inc. v. Glenn-Stewart-Pinckney Builders & Developers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- United States v. Cortelyou & Cole, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.