Legal Opinion

Deegan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 11, 1987No. 4-86-1103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court, without giving any written reasons for doing so, imposed a sentence for revocation of probation that constituted a two-cell deviation from the guideline sentence for appellant’s underlying offense of battery on a law enforcement officer. Although a trial court may make a one-cell deviation from the guidelines after revocation of probation without giving a reason for departure, written reasons for departure must accompany any greater deviation. The Florida Bar Re: Rules of Criminal Procedure, 482 So.2d 311 (Fla.1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11), (14), Fla.R.Crim.P.; Carter v. State,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Florida Bar Re: Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API