Legal Opinion

People v. Miner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s argument that the jury’s verdict is repugnant. The fact that the jury did not believe that defendant possessed a knife does not negate the forcible compulsion element of rape and sexual abuse in the first degree (see, People v Goodfriend, 100 AD2d 781, 781-782, affd 64 NY2d 695). Defendant argues that he was denied a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct. County Court sustained defendant’s objection to each instance of alleged misconduct, and defendant did not request further curative instruction or move for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GoodfriendNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. CurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. GoodfriendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. BalkumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. TyranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API