Legal Opinion
O'Neal ex rel. G.O. v. Bumbo International Trust
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided April 14, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00013-JMS-DKLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Bumbo International Trust’s {“Bumbo") Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). [Filing No. 87.] For the following reasons, the Court concludes that it has personal jurisdiction over Bumbo and DENIES the motion.
I
Background
The Court draws the following factual background from the evidence submitted by the parties. Bumbo manufactures the Bumbo Seat, which is a seat used by infants. In March 2009, Plaintiffs Leanne O’Neal and Joseph O’Neal received a second-hand Bumbo Seat from a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- O'CONNOR v. Sandy Lane Hotel Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Relaximals, Inc. v. Brentwood Originals, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Wilson v. CooperSurgical, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023