Legal Opinion

McKlosky v. Kobylarz

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainants are husband and wife,. He is in his seventieth year and she is in the fifties. They are illiterate people, the husband having been a laborer all his life. He was born in that part of Austria which is now called Czecho-Slovakia, and is of an intellectual standing that might be assumed from these facts. The defendant is a man in the prime of life, of keen mind, good address, and engaged in the real estate and insurance business. The complainants had succeeded in accumulating sufficient funds and credit to embark upon the construction of a small two-family house upon a tract of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. Mercury Capital Corp. v. Freehold Office Park, Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. Stramke v. George A. Raker Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API