Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1992No. 91-KA-709PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WICKER, Judge.
Defendant, Mackie Clark, was charged by Bill of Information with a violation of La.R.S. 40:971.1 in that he did knowingly and intentionally distribute a counterfeit substance held out to be cocaine. As part of a plea bargain, Clark entered a Crosby1 guilty plea to La.R.S. 40:971.1, pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. Art. 893. He was sentenced to two years at hard labor. Execution of the sentence was suspended and the defendant was placed on inactive probation for two years. He was ordered to pay court costs and a $50.00 law enforcement fee. Additionally, he was ordered to perform 100 hours…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Jackson v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- State v. ValleeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993