Ashland Publishing Co. v. Asbury
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1ConcurrenceLester, Judge
I believe this litigation to be of such significance so as to require comments upon several arguments made both orally and by way of brief by counsel.
My colleagues first approach the basic issue of press coverage of pretrial proceedings by “assessment of the competing societal interests involved” (Justice Stewart in Gannett Co., Inc. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 99 S.Ct. 2989, 61 L.Ed.2d 608, 629 (1979) quoting from Justice Powell’s dissent in Saxbe v. Washington Post Co., 417 U.S. 843, 94 S.Ct. 2811, 41 L.Ed.2d 514, 525 (1974)). This test I consider to be appropriate in cases of this nature,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Saxbe v. Washington Post Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wendling v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.